<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Partitioning Example</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sqlfool.com/2008/11/102/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sqlfool.com/2008/11/102/</link>
	<description>Adventures in SQL Tuning - a blog for the rest of us</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 08:21:02 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Meg</title>
		<link>http://sqlfool.com/2008/11/102/comment-page-1/#comment-5013</link>
		<dc:creator>Meg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 23:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlfool.com/?p=102#comment-5013</guid>
		<description>if i set a filegroup to readonly.. what&#039;s with index reorg? ... if parts of the index is in the readonly filegroup

Regards Meg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if i set a filegroup to readonly.. what&#8217;s with index reorg? &#8230; if parts of the index is in the readonly filegroup</p>
<p>Regards Meg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis Simoes</title>
		<link>http://sqlfool.com/2008/11/102/comment-page-1/#comment-286</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis Simoes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 17:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlfool.com/?p=102#comment-286</guid>
		<description>If we switch out/in data to temporary tables using the same partition function can it be faster or using primary with constraints is the fastest method?

Regards</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we switch out/in data to temporary tables using the same partition function can it be faster or using primary with constraints is the fastest method?</p>
<p>Regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Ufford</title>
		<link>http://sqlfool.com/2008/11/102/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Ufford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 19:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlfool.com/?p=102#comment-3</guid>
		<description>In terms of the actual code, it&#039;s pretty similar.  However, what&#039;s occurring behind the scenes is pretty different.  Associating a partitioning function with a partitioning scheme affects where data is physically stored; instantiation, on the other hand, creates an object in memory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In terms of the actual code, it&#8217;s pretty similar.  However, what&#8217;s occurring behind the scenes is pretty different.  Associating a partitioning function with a partitioning scheme affects where data is physically stored; instantiation, on the other hand, creates an object in memory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Robbins</title>
		<link>http://sqlfool.com/2008/11/102/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Robbins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 18:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlfool.com/?p=102#comment-2</guid>
		<description>/* Associate the partition function with a partition scheme. */
CREATE Partition Scheme test_monthlyDateRange_ps
    AS Partition test_monthlyDateRange_pf
    All TO ([PRIMARY]);


This seems to be similar to instantiating an object in OOP .NET.... variableOne ClassType = new ClassType....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>/* Associate the partition function with a partition scheme. */<br />
CREATE Partition Scheme test_monthlyDateRange_ps<br />
    AS Partition test_monthlyDateRange_pf<br />
    All TO ([PRIMARY]);</p>
<p>This seems to be similar to instantiating an object in OOP .NET&#8230;. variableOne ClassType = new ClassType&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
