<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Max INT Identity Value Reached (DBCC CheckIdent)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sqlfool.com/2008/11/max-int-identity-value-reached-dbcc-checkident/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sqlfool.com/2008/11/max-int-identity-value-reached-dbcc-checkident/</link>
	<description>Self-Professed SQL Scripting Junkie!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 08:30:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Identity Columns: Are You Nearing The Limits? &#171; SQL Fool</title>
		<link>http://sqlfool.com/2008/11/max-int-identity-value-reached-dbcc-checkident/comment-page-1/#comment-5534</link>
		<dc:creator>Identity Columns: Are You Nearing The Limits? &#171; SQL Fool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 16:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlfool.com/?p=99#comment-5534</guid>
		<description>[...] yourself quickly approaching your max limit and need to implement a quick and dirty fix, you can reseed your identity column. Of course, this only works if you started at zero instead of the actual lower, negative limit.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] yourself quickly approaching your max limit and need to implement a quick and dirty fix, you can reseed your identity column. Of course, this only works if you started at zero instead of the actual lower, negative limit.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DWB</title>
		<link>http://sqlfool.com/2008/11/max-int-identity-value-reached-dbcc-checkident/comment-page-1/#comment-5409</link>
		<dc:creator>DWB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Nov 2010 21:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlfool.com/?p=99#comment-5409</guid>
		<description>Please check http://blog.almondsolutions.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please check <a href="http://blog.almondsolutions.com" rel="nofollow">http://blog.almondsolutions.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Ufford</title>
		<link>http://sqlfool.com/2008/11/max-int-identity-value-reached-dbcc-checkident/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Ufford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 22:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlfool.com/?p=99#comment-11</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re absolutely correct!  Thanks for pointing that out, I&#039;ll update the blog post now.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re absolutely correct!  Thanks for pointing that out, I&#8217;ll update the blog post now.  <img src='http://sqlfool.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://sqlfool.com/2008/11/max-int-identity-value-reached-dbcc-checkident/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 22:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlfool.com/?p=99#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Actually, that would be &quot;count upward toward zero&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, that would be &#8220;count upward toward zero&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

