<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Partitioning 101</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sqlfool.com/2008/11/partitioning-101/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sqlfool.com/2008/11/partitioning-101/</link>
	<description>Adventures in SQL Tuning - a blog for the rest of us</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 08:21:02 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Partitioning Tricks : SQL Fool</title>
		<link>http://sqlfool.com/2008/11/partitioning-101/comment-page-1/#comment-4970</link>
		<dc:creator>Partitioning Tricks : SQL Fool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 19:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlfool.com/?p=88#comment-4970</guid>
		<description>[...] for more information on table partitioning? Check out my overview of partitioning, my example code, and my article on indexing on partitioned [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for more information on table partitioning? Check out my overview of partitioning, my example code, and my article on indexing on partitioned [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SQL Fool</title>
		<link>http://sqlfool.com/2008/11/partitioning-101/comment-page-1/#comment-4456</link>
		<dc:creator>SQL Fool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 23:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlfool.com/?p=88#comment-4456</guid>
		<description>[...] toyed with the idea of rolling my own version of replication with Service Broker because of the inability to swap out partitions on a replicated table in SQL 2005. But I still haven&#8217;t had a good excuse to build and deploy Service Broker to production, so [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] toyed with the idea of rolling my own version of replication with Service Broker because of the inability to swap out partitions on a replicated table in SQL 2005. But I still haven&#8217;t had a good excuse to build and deploy Service Broker to production, so [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
