Comments on: Performance Comparison of Singleton, XML, and TVP Inserts http://sqlfool.com/2008/11/performance-comparison-of-singleton-xml-and-tvp-inserts/ Adventures in SQL Tuning - a blog for the rest of us Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:28:07 -0700 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: Metadata for Table Valued Parameters « SQL Fool http://sqlfool.com/2008/11/performance-comparison-of-singleton-xml-and-tvp-inserts/comment-page-1/#comment-5334 Metadata for Table Valued Parameters « SQL Fool Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:10:33 +0000 http://sqlfool.com/?p=156#comment-5334 [...] into a table. Previously, the most common way of doing this was by passing and parsing XML. As I've previously posted, TVP's perform an astounding 94% faster than singleton inserts and 75% faster than XML inserts. But [...] [...] into a table. Previously, the most common way of doing this was by passing and parsing XML. As I've previously posted, TVP's perform an astounding 94% faster than singleton inserts and 75% faster than XML inserts. But [...]

]]> By: SQL Server Blog by Jason Massie http://sqlfool.com/2008/11/performance-comparison-of-singleton-xml-and-tvp-inserts/comment-page-1/#comment-4408 SQL Server Blog by Jason Massie Sun, 07 Jun 2009 19:13:13 +0000 http://sqlfool.com/?p=156#comment-4408 [...] Recent Highlight: Performance Comparison of Singleton, XML, and TVP Inserts [...] [...] Recent Highlight: Performance Comparison of Singleton, XML, and TVP Inserts [...]

]]> By: SQL Server Blog by Jason Massie http://sqlfool.com/2008/11/performance-comparison-of-singleton-xml-and-tvp-inserts/comment-page-1/#comment-16 SQL Server Blog by Jason Massie Mon, 17 Nov 2008 02:25:32 +0000 http://sqlfool.com/?p=156#comment-16 <strong>New\Newish SQL Blogs(at least to me)...</strong> ... New\Newish SQL Blogs(at least to me)…

…

]]>