Replication Bug with Partitioned Tables

Recently, we came across a bug in SQL Server 2005 on one of our production servers. Apparently, if you execute an ALTER TABLE statement on a replicated table with more than 128 partitions, the log reader will fail. A relatively obscure bug, I know. Microsoft has recognized this as a confirmed bug, but I couldn’t find it anywhere on the intertubes, thus the inspiration for this blog post. Microsoft’s official solution for this issue is to upgrade to SQL Server 2008.

For various reasons, we were unable to execute an upgrade at the time. And since this was a 2 terabyte database, we wanted to come up with a solution that wouldn’t involve reinitializing the entire publication. Our quick-fix while we were troubleshooting the issue was to create a linked server to the production box. Not ideal, I know, but it worked in a pinch and minimized exposure of the issue. Fortunately for us, we were able to solve the problem on the publication database pretty easily. All of the affected partition functions had empty partitions created several months in the future, so we simply merged any empty partition ranges for future dates. Our solution to our now-out-of-date subscribers was to apply static row filtering to any table with more than 100 million records. While this would introduce some overhead with the replication of these tables, it would allow us a much faster recovery time. We decided to use the start of the most recent hour as our filtering criteria, just to give us a “clean” filter, so we had to delete data from any table where we were going to apply the filter. After that, it was simply a matter of resuming replication.

All things considered, it took us a little over a day to recover from the issue. Most of that time was spent troubleshooting the problem and identifying a workable solution; actual execution of the changes was pretty quick. Moral of the story? Upgrade to SQL Server 2008. :)

0saves
If you enjoyed this post, please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the RSS feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.
Tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>